Everything You Need to Know About Miro Wish List
The Wish List is where we gather ideas directly from members of the Miro Community to help us make Miro even better. Excited to contribute? Here’s eve...
296296
What do you wish you could do with Miro? Add your dream features and support other ideas by upvoting them.
Would it be possible to provide a native version of the Windows application for ARM processors in the future? While the 64-bit version basically runs acceptably thanks to the emulation in Windows 11 ARM, it is an advantage for larger boards in terms of energy consumption and performance if the Miro app itself has been compiled and made available for ARM. (The current work-around is to use the browser instead of the Miro app, but that feels a bit second-class).
The REST API returns data_table_format items with no title or name field — every table has a visible name in the Miro UI, but developers can't access it programmatically. What we tried:GET /v2/boards/{id}/items?type=data_table_format — returns tables but no title field. Other item types (sticky notes, shapes, text, cards) all include content/title.GET /v2-experimental/boards/{id}/tables/{id} — has the title, but returns 403 for standard OAuth apps (boards:read boards:write). No additional scope available to unlock it.MCP context_explore — returns generic names like "Table 3458764661623371178" instead of real names. Works for frames/docs but not tables.MCP context_get — the only thing that works. Returns an AI-generated summary where the name appears in prose like titled "Planner Tasks". We extract it with regex.Why this workaround is bad:~10-15s latency per table (AI processes all row data just to produce a summary) Non-deterministic output — same table returns different prose each call; sometimes the name isn't mentioned at all Requires regex against natural language (fragile) No way to ask for "just the title" — context_get only accepts a URL Requires a separate OAuth 2.1 flow (DCR + PKCE) just to connect to MCP Tokens expire hourlyWe're using an AI content analysis tool as a metadata lookup. The data already exists in the Miro backend — it just needs a field on the REST response. The ask: Add a title field to data_table_format items in the v2 API, or make the experimental tables API accessible to standard OAuth apps.
Please add the option to flip / mirror images both directions
I used to use the parent/child column type in Miro tables to better structure data we keep in Miro. Now, that feature has been locked away and requires an Advanced License, not just Full. Why can’t I manually structure my data this way?I don’t want to bug our purchasing department for a full license upgrade just for that feature, and wish you could just bring this feature back to the plan that we do already pay for. In the meantime, I’ll probably use stickies instead, and research different tools.
This request relates to using Miro with a mouse. Would it be possible for the user to toggle scroll wheel behaviour?When zooming into a board I prefer to roll the scroll wheel up. After years of CAD drawing this feels most natural. I’ve taken to using MOS to reverse scroll direction, which makes navigating Miro a much more satisfying experience. It produces a minor issue in that dropdown menus (e.g. for fonts) and settings screens scroll incorrectly, but this is tolerable.I’d be interested to hear whether having such functionality within Miro would be helpful for others.
When uploading to the board, I would love to be able to select documents from the “recent” list within Google Drive, or any platform for that matter. I have a lot of documents with similar names, so just searching for them pulls up older versions of the document, or other documents with similar names. Then I have to sort through them all to find the one I just created. If “recent” docs were and option, it would pull the doc just created to the top of the list. Thanks! Love the product.
While pricing model changes are understandably a business decision, the implementation has directly impacted work already in progress.Specifically, this affects subtasks within tables: I have existing tables built using subtasks. Due to the licensing change, I can no longer delete existing subtasks. I also cannot convert existing subtasks into main tasks. At the same time, I am unable to create new subtasks, only main-level tasks. This has left me with boards that are now structurally inconsistent: Some rows are locked as subtasks that I cannot edit, delete, or promote. Other rows can only be added at the main level. I cannot standardise or complete the table as originally designed. At minimum, users should retain the ability to: Delete existing subtasks. Convert subtasks into main tasks. Maintain structural consistency in boards created under the previous licensing model. It is highly disruptive to have active work rendered partially unusable due to a licensing shift. If features must move to a higher tier, there needs to be a transition pathway that allows existing work to be cleaned up or adjusted. Right now, I am stuck with a half-built table that cannot be completed or rationalised. I’d strongly encourage reconsideration of how these changes affect in-progress boards.
We seriously need a real export to Visio function.Not one that relies on draw.io ... Again if I wanted to use draw.io I would use draw.io.I do currently pay to use Miro but if I don't get anywhere with this soon I'm just going to have to go back to using Visio.
the ability to download the talk track and also while recording the talktrack an seting not to auto hide the add contents bar, right now i can add text only with keyboards shortcuts and i can't press the text add, this would be usefull for recording screen while doing an workshop and you need people to see your screen while real working and writing new things on the board
As admin / helper, I visii some board of our enterprise account, to give some feedback.In most of them I’m editor, and I’m always afraid to move/edit content “ by error”My idea is to be able to switch my self in “read only mode”
Hello Miro Team,We are embedding our internal web application inside a Miro board using the Miro embed feature.Our application works correctly when embedded in a standard iframe like this:<iframesrc="https://myapp.com/..."allow="fullscreen; clipboard-write"style="width:100%;height:100%;border:none;"></iframe>In this configuration: Fullscreen API works Clipboard copy works (navigator.clipboard.write) PNG download works via <a download> (Blob URL) However, when embedded via Miro’s embed feature, the generated iframe looks like this:<iframesrc="https://myapp.com/..."sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-forms allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox allow-modals allow-storage-access-by-user-activation"allow="encrypted-media"></iframe>In this configuration: Fullscreen is blocked Clipboard API is blocked (Permissions Policy violation) Standard downloads (<a download>) are blocked due to sandbox restrictions We understand and respect the security reasons behind restrictive sandbox and permissions policies for embeds.However, in our case: The embedded application is fully controlled by us. It is hosted on a trusted domain. The intended usage is interactive, not read-only viewing. RequestWould it be possible to support one of the following options: Allow additional permissions for embeds: allow="fullscreen; clipboard-write" sandbox including allow-downloads Provide embed configuration options (checkboxes/toggles) to enable: Fullscreen Clipboard write Downloads Provide a “Trusted Domain Allowlist” feature, where specific domains can be granted expanded iframe permissions. We are not requesting unrestricted access, but rather a secure and controlled way to enable interactive applications inside Miro boards.This would significantly improve integration use cases where embedded tools are meant to be actively used, not just viewed.Thank you for considering this request.Best regards,
Haha. D’oh! Update: If you Shift + drag a shape, the current aspect ratio is maintained as you make it smaller/larger, so… this idea is not required.Furthermore, looking at the Shapes help article, I read:Styling a shapeYou can select several shapes at once and style them all.To create an even shape without changing its ratio, hold down Shift just like you would in any other graphics software.If “style” is the correct term for “resize”, then I prefer “resize”. In line with my idea of Force shapes to be symmetrical, I would like to see more transform options for objects in Miro - implemented for shapes first, with images being next.At the time of this post, when a shape is dragged by the corner, the object can be resized along two axes, but does not lock the original aspect ratio.I would like to see the following:Drag the corner of a shape/image to change the scale (make bigger/smaller) along two axes, while locking the original aspect ratio. Drag the side of an object to change scale along one axis only (to change the width or height independently). **the rest are nice-to-haves** Flip Mirror Rotate Shear PerspectiveCredit goes to this article for helping me better articulate my asks.
Allow multiple people to be selected as Assignee in Tables.
Every time I try to upload an image file to Miro Board, I am assaulted with an error message about a 32MP limit. Every time a Miro Board representative, has presented Miro Board to my firm and me, they have emphasized how easy it is just to drag images and drawings into the board and just start working with them, but it seems that is false advertising in terms of how Miro Board actually works. In practical reality, I try to drag a drawing into Miro Board and receive an error, forcing me to return to whichever program I was using and redo my previous step to export a file that will fit within Miro Board’s limits. I would note that neither Bluebeam Revu, nor Photoshop, nor any other application we may be working with will surface the megapixels of the drawing we are exporting, so that limit is a hard break for a Miro workflow. I know that Bluebeam Revu is a useful tool. I do not know that Miro Board is a useful tool. My suggestion is this. Miro Board should make itself a useful tool. Allow us to upload the files we are uploading. If Miro Board needs to down-res the images we are uploading, YOU, you Miro Board should do that at the upload step in the most frictionless way possible, instead of making me bounce out of Miro to another app and wonder why I am using this app at all.
Hi all!Dont you want all your To-Do’s in one place and still be free to use your favourite tools next to the “Company prescribed” ones? I do! As such: It would be so great to link Miro Kanban with Teams / MS Planner, so that To-Do’s would all appear neatly in one place. AND not have to design/ develop ideas & tasks in Miro and then go to Teams/PLanner to write them down and track them. Also look at my question here, thanks @Robert Johnson for confirming that this feature doesnt exist yet! Now just vote it up!
Boards in a team are not reliably displayed. I was trying to find a specific board that I have permission to see and was unable to do so even with the filters set as “All boards” “Owned by Anyone”. I could see the board in the list only after changing the sort filter I thought this may be browser caching but I did a hard reload of the site with developer tools open and it does the same thing. Also I think the missing board (red icon) only showed up in the “Last Opened” filter after I opened it from a direct link that someone gave me.I want to be able to see all the boards in a team without having to ask everyone for links to them. This was the closest thing I could find to report this as a defect.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.