While pricing model changes are understandably a business decision, the implementation has directly impacted work already in progress.
Specifically, this affects subtasks within tables:
-
I have existing tables built using subtasks.
-
Due to the licensing change, I can no longer delete existing subtasks.
-
I also cannot convert existing subtasks into main tasks.
-
At the same time, I am unable to create new subtasks, only main-level tasks.
This has left me with boards that are now structurally inconsistent:
-
Some rows are locked as subtasks that I cannot edit, delete, or promote.
-
Other rows can only be added at the main level.
-
I cannot standardise or complete the table as originally designed.
At minimum, users should retain the ability to:
-
Delete existing subtasks.
-
Convert subtasks into main tasks.
-
Maintain structural consistency in boards created under the previous licensing model.
It is highly disruptive to have active work rendered partially unusable due to a licensing shift. If features must move to a higher tier, there needs to be a transition pathway that allows existing work to be cleaned up or adjusted.
Right now, I am stuck with a half-built table that cannot be completed or rationalised. I’d strongly encourage reconsideration of how these changes affect in-progress boards.
