Skip to main content

Now when I zoom into project (when editing) by using mouse wheel I get jump between 51% and 143%, this makes it unusable. I need to zoom with more steps in between the 51 and 143 percent. How to configure these steps of zoom?

​I think I found the solution for this bug. I think it has to do something with zooming in and out in your browser. I work on Chrome and I had the same problem of the zooming going from 24% to 51% to ….

After zooming in with the browser and back to 100%, the issue fixed itself.
 

So maybe it’s also caused by accidentaly zooming in with the browser and offsetting some value?
@Marina FYI.


Hi ​@Joren Cosemans 

Thanks for sharing your experience! It’s interesting that adjusting the browser zoom helped resolve the issue for you. This could indeed indicate that browser zoom levels affect how Miro interprets zooming steps.

 

For anyone still experiencing this, here are a few things to try:

  • Reset your browser zoom to 100%

     

  • Check if the issue persists in incognito mode or another browser.
  • If using a touchpad or a high-DPI mouse, adjusting sensitivity settings might help.

Let us know if this helps or if the issue returns after a while. 


I’m using the Miro app on MacOS 13.4, and experience the same issue generally described above (Zoom levels going from 400% → 250% → 36% → 24%) on when using CMD + mouse scroll wheel (Logitec G900).

@Pablo Cettour‘s comment of the right click drag, then using the CMD + mouse scroll combination does work / ‘fix’ the issue (now 400% → 294 → 216% → 159 → 117 → 86 → 63 → 46% etc), which is much more usable. 

Definitely a bug though.

THIS WORKED GREAT!  THANK YOU FOR SHARING!


I’m using the Miro app on MacOS 13.4, and experience the same issue generally described above (Zoom levels going from 400% → 250% → 36% → 24%) on when using CMD + mouse scroll wheel (Logitec G900).

@Pablo Cettour‘s comment of the right click drag, then using the CMD + mouse scroll combination does work / ‘fix’ the issue (now 400% → 294 → 216% → 159 → 117 → 86 → 63 → 46% etc), which is much more usable. 

Definitely a bug though.

THIS WORKED GREAT!  THANK YOU FOR SHARING!

This somehow also worked for me.

Happy for that, frustrated that my first experience with the tool led to such a lousy experience on a basic and important feature


Reply