Skip to main content

Hello Miro community,

I’m following up on a previous post I made about using Autodesk and Miro together for design reviews. This time, I want to dive deeper into two specific topics:

Design reviews across disciplines

Many design reviews involve stakeholders who aren’t familiar with technical tools like Autodesk. How do you structure your Miro boards or facilitate discussions to make sure that non-technical participants can engage productively and meaningfully? What are the specific ways you use Miro to make them more accessible?

Streamlining approvals

Capturing feedback and securing sign-offs during reviews can often be a bottleneck. What strategies or workflows have you found effective in making this process more efficient? Do you rely on Miro for this, or do you integrate other tools alongside Autodesk and Miro to manage approvals?

I’d appreciate hearing how your teams navigate these challenges and any best practices you’ve developed.  

Some ideas from our template

Our team developed a CAD design review template for Autodesk for Miro which aims to make design reviews easier.

Our three-step Miro board has a special area where stakeholders can leave their thoughts. We even created special stamps for them.

 

 

But we know we need to do more to make your workflows even smoother, so your feedback will really help us build a better app.  

 

Thank you, and looking forward to your insights.

 

No replies yet...

Reply