I see so many great suggestions, with lots of votes - some of which are pretty basic needs to be met (Find and Replace feature as an example) that have been hanging around for years.
Would be great to understand
- How the wish list is evaluated
- Which tickets will be picked up / have been picked up
- Why certain tickets that have got large backing from the community aren’t being considered despite the length of time waiting (again, Find and Replace is a good example)
long time ago I suggested an status system to show how far the developers on the wishlist are:
https://community.miro.com/inspiration-and-connection-67/name-one-thing-you-think-our-community-does-well-one-thing-we-could-improve-5160?postid=21714#post21714
…
over the time I got more and more frustrated and realistic in case of miro’s user support
I see so many great suggestions, with lots of votes - some of which are pretty basic needs to be met (Find and Replace feature as an example) that have been hanging around for years.
Would be great to understand
Hi Lucie,
It is my understanding that Wish List posts with at least 50 votes are flagged for review.
I agree - It would be nice to know this.
No one outside of Miro knows what is/is not being considered, is in the early stages of development, etc. If a Wish List post item not been implemented yet, it is safe to assume there are higher priorities being worked on.